Posted March 2, 2016
Last year, when federal officials released the proposal for the next five-year offshore drilling plan, we said the draft had some positive aspects but fell short of the kind of strategic offshore planning that would adequately serve America’s role as an energy superpower. We also noted strong support for offshore development by mid-Atlantic states, where operations could occur under the draft plan.
Fast-forward to this month, with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) expected to reassess a plan that would be the blueprint for offshore energy development from 2017 through 2022. The need for a robust offshore leasing plan remains critically important – and the plan should retain the single Atlantic lease sale that was included in BOEM’s draft. Members of Congress recently urged this in a letter to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell:
“According to the EIA, Gulf of Mexico production is estimated to increase to record high levels in 2017. This increase in production is a result of the leasing decisions made a decade or more ago. Knowing that oil and natural gas will be needed for many more decades to come, DOI should not prematurely close the door on future leasing and exploration of the Atlantic OCS. Decisions made today matter.”
Public support for mid-Atlantic offshore energy development is strong. New public opinion polling shows that offshore oil and natural gas development is favored by sizable majorities in Virginia (65 percent), North Carolina (64 percent) and South Carolina (67 percent). Virginia Petroleum Council Executive Director Miles Morin:
“With the existing port, infrastructure, and wide variety of maritime industries like shipbuilding and engineering, Hampton Roads can help strengthen our national security and fuel the energy our nation demands. The military has considerable input into areas in the Atlantic that can be explored and, given that the proposed area for development is well past the horizon at 50 miles, offshore platforms would not be visible from land.”
North Carolina Petroleum Council Executive Director David McGowan:
“North Carolina is uniquely positioned to add jobs and create revenue for local needs through energy development, like schools, infrastructure, beach re-nourishment and inlet dredging. North Carolina has the largest coastal area within the proposed leasing zone, meaning we stand to benefit more than any other Atlantic Coast state. … Energy development can safely coexist with our current tourism and fishing industries while at the same time providing much needed diversity for our local economies.”
Certainly, the residents of the three mid-Atlantic states are aware of the economic and energy benefits that could result from safe offshore oil and gas development. It’s reflected in polling data that shows strong support for domestic energy and the U.S. energy revolution:
South Carolina Petroleum Council Executive Director Bonnie Loomis:
“A strong bipartisan majority of voters in South Carolina continue to support producing more domestic energy and creating more jobs in the state. Cutting-edge technologies and a core value of safety have helped make the U.S. the number one producer of oil and natural gas in the world while protecting the environment and creating jobs in South Carolina.”
The economic, consumer and security benefits of America’s energy revolution are real and simply require policy decisions that will help sustain the revolution and its contributions. This includes access to energy reserves controlled by Washington, offshore and onshore. The potential benefits of expanded access to the Atlantic offshore is a guide. A Quest Offshore Resources study projects that by 2035 expanded Atlantic access could create 280,000 jobs, result in cumulative capital investment of $194 billion, increase total GDP/year $23 billion, generate cumulative government revenue $51 billion and add 1.34 million barrels of oil equivalent per day.
These are some of the significant benefits from safe offshore development. In this election year, it’s never been more important for Americans to consider energy policy as they make voting choices.
Mark Green joins API after spending 16 years as national editorial writer in the Washington Bureau of The Oklahoman newspaper. In all, he has been a reporter and editor for more than 30 years, including six years as sports editor at The Washington Times. He lives in Occoquan, Virginia, with his wife Pamela. Mark graduated from the University of Oklahoma with a degree in journalism and earned a masters in journalism and public affairs at American University. He's currently working on a masters in history at George Mason University, where he also teaches as an adjunct professor in the Communication Department.
Energy Tomorrow is a project of the American Petroleum Institute – the only national trade association that represents all aspects of America’s oil and natural gas industry – speaking for the industry to the public, Congress and the Executive Branch, state governments and the media.